Search Keyword & Location:

    Got a question for the community?

Real-Estate Articles

Loading...

E-mail Alerts

I am a first time home buyer. I have no debt and $250K cash so I can pay for a house upfront. Should I do this, or pay 20% down and get a mortgage? Additiona info: (1) the home is for my 88 year old father (for now) and Im not 100% sure Id live there afte

rated by 0 users
Answered (Not Verified) This post has 0 verified answers | 2 Replies | 3 Followers

Not Ranked
1 Posts
Michelle C. posted on 6 Feb 2012 02:57 AM

I am a first time home buyer. I have no debt and $250K cash so  I can pay for a house upfront. Should I do this, or pay 20% down and get a mortgage? Additiona info: (1) the home is for my 88 year old father (for now) and Im not 100% sure Id live there afterwards... (2) Im not sure of how good my credit is these days.. havent lived in the US for over 10 years.

All Replies

Not Ranked
1 Posts
Suggested by Equity Depot
Michelle, even though you have 250k in cash, it is better to put down 20% or more and get a mortgage. As housing prices go up you will reap the benefits of that decision. For example if you finance a home for 250k and put 50k down you will actually finance 200k. If the property goes up 8%, it now worth 216k and you have an appreciation of 16k. You can take the 200k and put in a commercial REIT (real estate investment trust) or start investing in property yourself. If you credit score is 680 or above you can get a good rate as an investor and potential purchase 2 to 3 other properties that you can rent out to receive rental income. If you would like to discuss any of these options contact me (DC) at equitydepot@gmail.com I am an investor and partner in a local real estate fund that buys, sells and rents in South Florida. Good Luck
Not Ranked
1 Posts

I see that some homes sold for 30k in Edgewater, Fl where I used to live. The estimated value is 99k. There are a few like that there. I wonder if I could buy a home, put 20% down, and rent it out. I'm a bit confused though. When I look at some homes in NC, there is something called a "transfer price" and there's the estimated value. Let's say the transfer price is $140k and the estimated value is 65k. What would an investor probably pay for that home? I just wondered how that works. Surely nobody would pay more than the estimated value for the home, right? Yet, I look at the sold prices on a lot of homes and it's higher than the estimated home value. Do you see why I'm confused? Let me know your thoughts.

Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS
The information in this Community is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as expert or professional advice or substitute for professional, financial or other such counsel. RealtyTrac and its affiliates assume no liability for any inaccurate information, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. The content submitted by each user has been supplied by such individual or firm without verification by RealtyTrac, and is considered public property since it will be published publically to the online world. Any content submitted by a user is strictly the opinion of that user; RealtyTrac assumes no responsibility or liability for any content published in the Community. Submitting content to the Community does not initiate or constitute a business relationship with RealtyTrac or any user.